Analyzing ATKINS WS GBP0.005 (WATKF) & Engility (EGL)

ATKINS WS GBP0.005 (OTCMKTS: WATKF) and Engility (NYSE:EGL) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

How to Become a New Pot Stock Millionaire

This table compares ATKINS WS GBP0.005 and Engility’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ATKINS WS GBP0.005 N/A N/A N/A
Engility -1.82% 12.16% 4.10%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.1% of Engility shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Engility shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ATKINS WS GBP0.005 and Engility’s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
ATKINS WS GBP0.005 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Engility $1.93 billion 0.50 -$35.19 million $2.33 11.14

ATKINS WS GBP0.005 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Engility.

Risk and Volatility

ATKINS WS GBP0.005 has a beta of -0.16, suggesting that its share price is 116% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Engility has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for ATKINS WS GBP0.005 and Engility, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ATKINS WS GBP0.005 0 0 0 0 N/A
Engility 1 4 4 0 2.33

Engility has a consensus target price of $34.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.97%. Given Engility’s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Engility is more favorable than ATKINS WS GBP0.005.

Summary

Engility beats ATKINS WS GBP0.005 on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Engility Company Profile

Engility Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides a range of technical services to the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of State, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Homeland Security, and space-related and intelligence community agencies. It offers systems engineering and integration services, including engineering and technology lifecycle support, information assurance, modeling and simulation, and architecture analysis and modernization; and cybersecurity services, such as vulnerability assessments and penetration testing, independent test and evaluation, cybersecurity systems engineering, cyber quick reaction range capability, and cyber hunting. The company also provides high performance computing services comprising architecture and infrastructure design, data management and analytics, and integration and testing, as well as systems operation, optimization, and sustainment; and enterprise modernization services, which include architecture analysis and modernization, information technology services and solutions, and software development and integration. In addition, it offers mission and operations support solutions in the areas of artificial intelligence, space launch and space flight, law enforcement, intelligence analysis, air traffic management, engineering and fabrication, and communication data exchange; and readiness and training solutions, including training development, learning, and knowledge management. The company was incorporated in 2012 and is based in Chantilly, Virginia. Engility Holdings, Inc. is a subsidiary of Birch Partners, LP.

Receive News & Ratings for ATKINS WS GBP0.005 Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for ATKINS WS GBP0.005 and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Leave a Reply