Eagle Point Credit (ECC) vs. NIPPON STEEL & SUM (NSSMY) Head to Head Comparison

Eagle Point Credit (NYSE: ECC) and NIPPON STEEL & SUM (OTCMKTS:NSSMY) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

How to Become a New Pot Stock Millionaire

Eagle Point Credit has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIPPON STEEL & SUM has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

57.1% of Eagle Point Credit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of NIPPON STEEL & SUM shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Eagle Point Credit shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Eagle Point Credit and NIPPON STEEL & SUM’s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Eagle Point Credit $65.29 million 5.32 $31.13 million $1.88 9.82
NIPPON STEEL & SUM $42.85 billion 0.50 $1.22 billion $1.30 17.45

NIPPON STEEL & SUM has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Point Credit. Eagle Point Credit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NIPPON STEEL & SUM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Eagle Point Credit and NIPPON STEEL & SUM, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eagle Point Credit 0 0 4 0 3.00

Eagle Point Credit presently has a consensus price target of $21.13, suggesting a potential upside of 14.44%. Given Eagle Point Credit’s higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Eagle Point Credit is more favorable than NIPPON STEEL & SUM.


This table compares Eagle Point Credit and NIPPON STEEL & SUM’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eagle Point Credit 47.68% 10.46% 7.06%
NIPPON STEEL & SUM 4.16% 5.62% 2.55%


Eagle Point Credit pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. NIPPON STEEL & SUM pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Eagle Point Credit pays out 127.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NIPPON STEEL & SUM pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.


Eagle Point Credit beats NIPPON STEEL & SUM on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Eagle Point Credit

Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Company’s primary investment objective is to generate high current income, with a secondary objective to generate capital appreciation. The Company primarily invests in equity and junior debt tranches of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) that are collateralized by a portfolio consisting primarily of the below investment grade United States senior secured loans. It may also invest in other securities and instruments related to these investments. The Company’s portfolio includes its investments in various industries, such as business equipment and services; healthcare; electronics/electrical; leisure goods/activities/movies; retailers (except food and drug); chemicals and plastics; telecommunications; financial intermediaries, and utilities. The Company’s advisor is Eagle Point Credit Management LLC.


Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation engages in steelmaking and steel fabrication businesses worldwide. The company operates through Steelmaking and Steel Fabrication, Engineering and Construction, Chemicals, New Materials, and System Solutions segments. It offers steel plates; steel sheets, such as hot-dip coated and electroplated steel sheets, tin plates, and electrical steel sheets; bar and rod materials; and structural steel products. The company also provides pipes and tubes; railway parts, including railway wheels, axles, couplers, bogie trucks, brake discs, control bogies, brake calipers, and test equipment; automotive and construction machinery parts, such as crankshafts and front axles, aluminum wheels, and permanent magnet retarders; and industrial machinery parts comprising die materials, mill rolls, curved forgings, steel forgings, and shape-memory alloys. In addition, it provides titanium products for use in heat exchangers, automobiles, construction materials, consumer products, electric power, and desalination fields; stainless steel products comprising plates, sheets, formed steel, bars, wire rods, clad steel sheets, stainless steel foils, and nickel products; and steel slags. Further, the company performs construction work under contract; and engages in waste processing and recycling activities, as well as in supplying electricity, gas, and heat. Additionally, it offers coal-based chemical products and petrochemicals, as well as electronic materials for industrial and high-function applications, as well as in other areas; and materials for semiconductors and electronic parts, carbon fiber and composite products, and products that apply technologies for metal processing and joining. The company also provides solutions in the planning, configuration, operation, and maintenance of IT systems for clients in a range of business fields. The company was founded in 1949 and is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Receive News & Ratings for Eagle Point Credit Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Eagle Point Credit and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

Leave a Reply